On December 6, 2017, the United States and Australia held the sixth joint committee meeting of the U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement to verify the implementation of the agreement, including specific issues related to trade in goods and services and issues related to intellectual property rights and investment. Following the signing of the free trade agreement, there was initial talk that the U.S. agricultural sector would put pressure on the agreement, fearing that it would interfere with the government`s agricultural subsidy program. However, the agreement with deadlines for importing Australian agricultural products, such as beef and sugar cane, has allayed concerns in the US agricultural market (while many Australian producers were very frustrated). Most goods imported into the United States under the Australian Free Trade Agreement (AUFTA) are subject to tariffs and goods (MPF). All AUFTA goods are duty-free on January 1, 2022. Information for U.S. exporters is available at the Department of Commerce`s address at: 2016.export.gov/FTA/index.asp. Many people on the Australian film and television scene have expressed concern about the impact of the agreement on government rules to impose a mandatory minimum of locally produced content on television.
Given that US content can be purchased by networks at a reasonable price compared to local production of Australian content, there was concern that the agreement would further reduce the proportion of domestic media in Australian television channels and Australian cinemas. As a result, the Media, Entertainment and Art Alliance, as well as a number of prominent artists, have individually supported the rejection of the free trade agreement because it would undermine Australian culture. While the system is very effective at keeping many drug prices low, pharmaceutical companies in both the U.S. and Australia are cautious about operating the system, saying that higher drug prices are needed to finance research and development costs. U.S. pharmaceutical companies assert that Australians act primarily at no research cost in the United States draft text of the U.S. Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA), according to Article 19.2, „the parties recognize that it is inappropriate to promote trade or investment by weakening or reducing the safeguards granted in their respective environmental legislation.“ The agreement also improves Australia`s services, trade and investment prospects, improves the regulatory and investment environment between the two countries and promotes increasing business mobility. The section also provides for the establishment of an agriculture committee that „provides Australia and the United States with a formal opportunity to discuss a wide range of agricultural issues, including trade promotion measures; Barriers to trade And to consult the export competition. In addition, workers` groups expressed concern about the agreement. In a report to the USTR office, the Laboratory Advisory Committee (LAC) recommended that Congress reject the U.S.-Australia free trade agreement because they believed the agreement did not meet the negotiating objectives of Congress.  Publication 3722 of the International Trade Commission: this publication contains the HTSUS General Note 28 and a list of goods that have become duty-free upon entry into force, as well as the exit schedule for goods that, over time, become duty-free.
The Australia-U.S. Free Trade Agreement is a preferential agreement between Australia and the United States, modelled on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). AUSFTA was signed on May 18, 2004 and officially came into force on January 1, 2005. Article 21.1 of the U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA) provides for a joint committee to oversee the implementation of the acco