Parts of these conservation agreements have not been disclosed for reasons of trust or because they contain culturally sensitive images. HCPs are designed to be flexible to accommodate a number of projects that vary widely in size and size, ranging from individual real estate developments to hundreds of thousands of hectares involving multiple parts. An HCP, created to build a detached house on 0.44 hectares of land in the Scotts Valley, California, proposed mitigation and minimization measures for mount Hermon June (Polyphylla barbata) and Ben Lomond Spineflower (Chorizanthe pungens var. hartwegiana).  Measures for Project 5.856 ft2 did not include construction in rural areas where the spine is located and the elimination of the growth of non-native plants in the countryside in order to avoid competition. Beetle protection measures took into account livestock and theft activities and proposed landscaping to promote beetle habitat.  Amendment of the October 2011 Conservation Agreement (PDF – 594.83 KB) (DOC – 737.5 KB) Thornton, R. D. 1994. Industry perspectives on habitat protection plans. Solve 26:12-14. Safe Harbor Agreements and subsequent improvements in survival permits encourage landowners to make conservation efforts for listed species by assuring landowners that they are not subject to increased land use restrictions because of their efforts to attract species listed on their property, or the number or distribution of listed species that are already on their land. If the Minister believes that a measure taken by an individual has violated or may have violated a provision of Part 3 of the EPBC Act, a conservation agreement may involve remediation or mitigation measures.
The Safe Harbor Agreements are a new model for the protection and restoration of endangered species by supporting landowners who are essential to species regeneration, while ensuring that they will not face new restrictions in their countries because of their good management practices. Most projects requiring random use authorization have an impact on habitat or habitat loss. Reducing habitat loss requires habitat replacement or protection within the HCP zone or elsewhere. This can be done through a multitude of methods, including: Habitat conservation planning has changed dramatically in recent years. The growing scientific recognition of the role of private lands in the restoration of endangered species and the pioneering decision of the Palila Regional Court v. Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources (639 F.2d 495, 9. Cir., 1981) have both contributed to making Section 9 „an important force for species protection and a major headache for the development community“ (Thornton 1991, p. 610). Over the past decade, litigation over the application of Section 9 to private property has increased significantly (Thornton 1991). A notice is published on this site when the minister enters, varies or resigns from a conservation agreement. A conservation agreement is an agreement between the Australian Minister of the Environment and another person for the protection and preservation of biodiversity in a land or sea area. Australia`s environment minister will keep an updated list of existing conservation agreements.
Another method for the development of an HCP for target species of concern is to develop an HCP for a given type of habitat. Under this approach, a specific type of habitat present in the HCP zone is chosen by the permittee and usFWS/NMFS as the HCP`s centre of gravity, based on species known to be using habitat. Habitat-based HCP must take into account all sensitive species known to use habitat type and habitat-related needs. All species included in the habitat-based HCP can be included in the occasional hosting authorization. The benefit of developing a habitat-based HCP instead of an E-based HCP